2003 12 02 - Tue
posted by jack at 10:43 CET in / politics 
Some of you may have seen (in some obscure media outlet) mention of Neil Bush admitting, in his divorce papers, that he played around with some undisclosed number of prostitutes in Southeast Asia while he was there "on business". Of course, this son-of-a-Bush can't just come clean, no; he is compelled to wrap this misadventure in a lie: see, the women simply knocked on his hotel door and then had sex with him; He didn't pay them, and therefore didn't know they were callgirls! Perhaps Neil thought his animal magnetism was so strong that women could smell him right through the door and out in the street, and simply had to have him. That he was there as a guest/"business partner" of the son of the former president of China doesn't seem to come into play there at all.
So, the obvious questions:
- How would the media handle this if it were Bill Clinton's brother?
- How does that compare with the actual media treatment?
Oh, that liberal bias, eh?
